The Journeyman

Occupy Austin

Last night, around 11 p.m., the Austin Police Department proceeded in an enforcement action of new policies established by the City of Austin concerning usage of the public areas of City Hall. In layterms, they evicted the protest.

photocredit: flickr/aaabbbccc8d

I’m torn on this issue. The first amendment freedom of assembly is extremely important. We, as citizenry, have the right to protest peacefully and that is an absolute cornerstone of the American democratic process.

But, I’m a pragmatist. A protest designed to be indefinite, seeking vague goal (“end corporate greed”) with an unclear reason to protest at City Hall seems silly to me. After reading their own brochure, I don’t understand what, specifically, they’re trying to protest.

I watched part of the eviction by way of OccupyAustin’s livestream team. One women, very upset, was decrying being evicted from “the home they have known for four months.” I’m not part of the 1%. Hell, I’m not in the top 50%. That plaza is my city hall too. It is as much “my home” as your home. This group has monopolized a very visible public plaza for four months. I care about the abortion issue. Could I have organized a protest at City Hall to attempt to impact decisions within the competency of the City around the anniversary of Roe v Wade?

I care about transportation issues. Could I have staged a “bike-in” at City Hall during that time? I care about electricity rates being fair for both Austin Energy and consumers, especially those struggling already. Could I have staged something at City Hall during this time, as Austin Energy (owned by the City), is debating rate increases?

Many will say yes, but it would either be mixed in with Occupy or, by virtue of the limitation of space, be smaller than it could have been. These are issues that the City not only can take action on but is the entity to take action.

Should the City have ordered their removal? I don’t know 1st Amendment law enough to begin to answer that question. I don’t know how absolute Freedom of Assembly is within our legal precedents. Can a protest use a public space permanently? Do I have a legitimate claim that they are restricting my ability to (effectively) protest by hogging City Hall?

What do you think? Leave a comment!

Posted

in

by

Brandon Kraft

Tags:

, ,

Comments

3 responses to “Occupy Austin”

  1. Patmom4 Avatar
    Patmom4

    There are permits that you can apply for to legally “occupy” a city space for a protest….for a finite length of time.   That is the legal way.  But, being that it was Austin (with a long-standing hippie tradition….keep Austin weird tradition), I was OK with the protests…for awhile.  It was time for the activists (if there were any true ones left) to move on to other methods of change:  letter writing campaigns, local media use, not to say blogging :-).

    Reply
  2. JohnL Avatar
    JohnL

    It’s one thing to hold a protest, it’s another thing to start living in a public park or right in front of city hall. That public space is not meant to be a free campground. These people should get jobs instead of whining that they aren’t getting free everything. There is no such thing as a right to whatever you want, for whatever reason you happen to want it.

    Reply
  3. Emazu Avatar
    Emazu

    They should have been evicted about 4 months ago if you ask me…….. 

    Reply

Leave a Reply