@emilytimes5 @EvilMopacATX That’s different. It’s in the constitution (that the government can’t prohibit free exercise of religion), which was your question.
Posted
in
Originally Published:
Sol 6213Modified:
Posted
in
Originally Published:
Sol 6213Modified:
Comments
One response
@emilytimes5 @EvilMopacATX The interpretation of that is the question. Between Reynolds and Yoder case law, it’s pretty safe in my mind to say that a court won’t strike down a pandemic order since there is a very compelling government interest, but that’s why you’d take this to court if you disagree.