Governor Greg Abbot is not opting Texas into the federal refugees settlement program. Under President Trump, the program changed to require specific opt-in by local officials. After 40+ states opted-in, Texas became the first to opt-out.
I’m very disappointed in our state, in particular our governor. The same day that he celebrates how strong Texas’ economy is, he announces Texas will not opt-in because we have too many needs at home.
We must not create and maintain this fear in “the other”—those who are homeless or those who are being settled into the Unites States. Texas can do better.
I was not a huge fan of President Bush while he was in office. I think his Iraq policy was extremely problematic and one we will be dealing with for sometime. The Patriot Act and his post-9/11 war against terrorism as an abstract created a dynamic of how we view and interact with authority that we will be realizing the negative effects of for some time (hello, United, using police to remove passengers from a plane).
All that said, I like him post-presidency and it is striking his interview with NPR compared to the current administration so far.
Worth the read and per Morning Edition on air this morning, there will be more on other topics discussed during the interview dropping during the day.
The Washington Post covered a usually mundane post-election event at Harvard where the various political players of the campaigns get together to discuss what went right, what went wrong, and lessons learned.
This cycle wasn’t as mundane. The emotions are much more raw still on the losing side while the winning side lacks the decorum normally shown post-election.
I’m still amazed at the pot-shots being taken at the media in all of this. In addition to “locker room talk”, the media was accused of taking Trump literally when he was really engaging in “dinner party talk”, which apparently is when you talk out of your ass at a dinner party without any real knowledge of a subject while acting like an authority. I need to check Urban Dictionary on that one. I try to stick to sounding authoritative on things I know while being clear on things I’m assuming, guessing, or trying to recall from hazy recollection.
Of course, that was part of the beauty of the winning campaign. Provide a show that the media will report on despite lack of substance (immediately following Trump’s campaign announcement) to gain traction, then accuse the media of lying which energizes a segment of the population who is frustrated while introducing additional seeds of doubt for anything the media says. Then, anything the media says negatively about Trump is easily dismissed by the segment he’s energizing and the continued train wreck keeps him above the fold all day every day.
If media outlets actually conspired against him and agreed not to cover his campaign–or simply cover it with equal time to the other candidates–he wouldn’t have been the force he was.
Clinton’s campaign lost the election by playing the game without heart while Trump’s campaign won by lighting the game on fire, sticking it up on YouTube, and letting it go viral.
Those of us who wanted to use data to take the pulse of the election (versus thinking that a few yard signs mean anything, says the guy whose street in Texas had a dozen Clinton signs and one Trump sign) learned a good lesson that data trends change all the time. The methodologies used aren’t perfect and change because they were found lacking.
FiveThirtyEight noted one imperfection in the polling: the lack of accounting for educational differences when weighting the results, which may have resulted in the state polling numbers failing, particularly in the states assumed by many to be in Clinton’s camp.
In the end, I hope this spectacle has an end so we can focus on the impact of policies.
This isn’t what I was expecting. There was no way Trump would win. He’s not going to win the primary. He did? He’s not going to win the general. But, he did.
I’m not sure how to proceed. If I lived in a vacuum and “Clinton” and “Trump” were just random names, I would say that while I disagree with the President-Elect on this or that, it’s important to respect the Office and important to work together toward a better America.
We don’t live in a vacuum. We have heard a lot from Trump. Being charitable, he’s been very loose with facts. He has mocked people with disabilities. He claimed to sexually assault women—and then play it off as “locker room talk”, as if the language used was the problem, not that bragging about grabbing women without permission, whether or not he was lying about it to impress an Access Hollywood reporter. He broke tradition and has yet to release his tax returns. What little bit was leaked out after deep investigation by the media suggests that his strong business sense that he campaigned on may not be sound. He claimed to give large amounts of money to charity while failing to providing any information to support the claim. After researching nearly 500 charities that he may have donated to, a reporter found extremely little to support that he’s given at all, much less to the level described.
For all of this extra work that the media has done, a public service given the lack of previous disclosure never serving in public office before, Trump has been extremely vocal about his hatred of the media. While they have flaws too, the four estate is an integral part of the American experiment. They are afforded the first amendment for a reason. Sadly, the media’s rapid attention to the train-wreck that is Trump and his campaign, from day one, propelled him. He plays people into thinking the media is corrupt while using them to get attention himself.
I could go on and on and on about his temperament, careless words, his tweetstorms, his absolute lack of class, and so on. It would just be too depressing to keep going.
None of our presidents have been perfect, but they all have generally been more honorable than not. I could trust them to think through the decisions before them and, while they might be different than what I would do in their shoes, I could still look up to them as the example of a leader. We say how we shouldn’t look at athletes as role models—they’re just really talented as a sport. Presidents are elected from across our country after an extremely long campaigning process, that includes being chosen as the flag-bearer of their party.
You’re right. Bill wasn’t always a great role model. His adulterous ways and his attempts to hide it did not live up to the expectations of the office. I’m not sure if they were worth impeaching him, but it’s incredible that the party that sought Bill’s impeachment nominated and led our country to choosing a man with a longer list of affairs, a list of sexual assault accusations that he said he would sue now that the election has past, multiple bankruptcies, with an open fraud suit before him. Let’s not question if his loose accounting between his foundation, campaign activities, and his personal checkbooks violated any FEC rules.
I want to support the President. I want to have an open mind. I want to be able to teach my daughters to respect the office while being able to respect the man in the office. I can’t do that when he’s talks about his success as a sexual predator who brags about walking into women’s dressing rooms. I can’t do that with a failure to offer a real apology for the actual actions and some sense of regret.
Oh, there’s so much. I haven’t begun to question if he would dismiss my daughter’s abilities because they are of Mexican heritage. Of the rage he inspires in his following that he does nothing to tame or direct toward positive action. He claims to want to bring us together after using and promoting incredibly divisive language. Of conflating so many issues and being incredibly causal on causation based on invalid facts.
A month ago, we were wondering if his VP pick would stay on the ticket with him or if his party would try to replace him because of the severity of what he said on tape. Today, we’re making plans for him taking the role of leader of the free world.
He brings out the worst in people with no attempt to help transform that for the greater good. He doesn’t take anger and outage to transform it into positive action. He takes anger and outage, encourages it, and unleashes it.
In 71 days, he will be our president. I truly hope Trump uses this time to demonstrate how he’s truly better than everything he’s presented himself to be.
In the last few years, I keep it light around here. Mostly I write about blogging, WordPress, silly stuff about my kids. The heavy stuff is usually something about fatherhood and losing my own dad before I was a teenager.
I haven’t written about politics since early college, as far as I can remember. And I don’t think this is a political post either.
Monday was the anniversary of the Sandy Hook shooting. Three years ago, an individual whom I do not wish to give any attention to by even mentioning his name, shot through the entrance of an elementary school, killing six adults working at the school, and killing twenty 1st graders.
Twenty children. Sixteen of them were six years old. Four were seven years old.
I didn’t process that when the shooting happened. I didn’t really pay attention to what that really meant until this year.
First graders. Six years old.
My six-year-old daughter is a first grader right now.
Why do we not care about dead kids?
Thinking about Sandy Hook makes me sick. And brings me to tears. Those twenty kids: Charlotte, Daniel, Olivia, Josephine, Dylan, Madeleine, Catherine, Chase, Jesse, Ana, James, Grace, Emilie, Jack, Noah, Caroline, Jessica, Avielle, Benjamin, Allison.
Those twenty families: The Bacons, the Bardens, the Engels, the Gays, the Hockleys, the Hsus, the Hubbards, the Kowalskis, the Lewises, the Marquez-Greenes, the Mattiolis, the Mcdonnells, the Parkers, the Pintos, the Pozners, the Previdis, the Rekoses, the Richmans, the Wheelers, the Wyatts.
The heroic actions taken by the staff at the school—six dead. Vicki Soto, 13 months younger than me, who hid her students in the classroom, told the shooter they were in the gym. Then when some of the scared kids ran out of their hiding places trying to get away, and the shooter began to shoot them, she threw herself in front of them.
And we don’t care. We don’t care about them. We don’t care about trying to fix the problem. We seem to care more about the people who do the killing than the victims or how to reduce the number of future victims.
Where is our outrage? Why has nothing changed? This individual committed no crime until he went upon school grounds with a gun.1
Not just a gun. A Bushmaster M4 with 30-round magazines. Within four minutes, this son of a bitch shot 154 bullets out of this gun into twenty six- and seven-year olds, and eight adults. All twenty kids killed. Six adults. He still had time to pull out a Glock handgun, take a random shot, then shoot himself. Four minutes. 156 shots. One shooter.
I’m not anti-gun. My dad owned guns and enjoyed hunting. Majority of my family hunts. Majority probably own guns. I’ve gone hunting. The last couple of bachelor weekends I’ve been on, we’ve went to the range to target and clay shoot. I had a great time. I have an interest in the back of my head to take a concealed handgun course, not to carry, but to become proficient on how to use a gun (I’m a decent shot with a shotgun, since well, it’s a shotgun, but my handgun skills weren’t great).
So, I say this not as a bleeding heart liberal that want to take every gun out of every private citizen’s hands and throw it into a molten pit.
Why is this gun legal? Why does anyone need this? Why does anyone need a 30-round magazine? Hell, why is it manufactured?
Despite this, any type of conversation on guns seem to be killed in the political sphere. Universal background checks on gun sales failed in the Senate. There’s no waiting period in Texas. No registration. No limit to the purchase of magazines. Private sales between individuals is legal as long as the buyer is 18, sober, and doesn’t intend to use it in a crime with no licensing, registration, notice, of any kind.
Where is our outrage?
Maybe guns aren’t the problem. Then, what is? Do we need more mental health specialists? Do we need to find ways to reduce the absurd stigma in this country associated with having mental health issues?
Where is the action to improve that side of the coin?
In any case, the solution is not having more people with guns around. Do we seriously want people working and visiting elementary schools with guns? How many accidental gun death have occurred when there wasn’t a gun within shooting distance (literally)?
I like to be prepared. I’m the guy who checks for the location of exits when entering a new space. I don’t like to sit with my back facing a window.
I look at the entrance of my daughter’s school. Yeah, it is locked and requires you to be buzzed in via a video intercom. That wouldn’t have stopped this guy. From the door, I can see my daughter’s classroom. I can see my daughter’s desk.
I can’t pretend this is an isolated event. Sure, this guy only committed this one crime and no one else worked with him. Sure, the Virgina Tech shooting was the same. The Aurora Colorado shooting. The Charleston shooting. The Chattanooga shooting. The Colorado Springs shooting. The Roseburg, Oregon shooting. I’m ignoring the home-invasion or domestic shootings like the Houston shooting this year where an ex-boyfriend killed his ex-girlfriend, her husband, and six kids—no, this was the 2015 one. You might be thinking of the 2014 Houston shooting by an ex-husband of his former wife, her husband, and their four kids.
I can’t pretend this is an isolated event, no. Can gun laws stop this? Are there other things we can do to stop it? The most difficult question is the saddest too: Are we even trying anymore?
He had shot and killed his mother just before this, so technically, yes, he had just committed a crime before going to the school. ↩
I’m glad to hear reports that the first nurse is now testing negative and that this didn’t get out of hand. Public health issues like this are fully within the role of government. It saddens me that Texas loves to claim independence until something isn’t right, then we blame it on it on Federal inaction.