·

Sol 6527

·

@pat_ramsey Even granting that, it’s such a weak response. I have a financial incentive to use less water, but I still have a yard with grass that needs watering. Absent of harder rules, I could still plant really thirsty grass if I felt like it was worth the cost to me. To a lot, it is.

Comments

  1. kraft

    @pat_ramsey Our HOA (which I generally don’t like HOAs, but I digress) mandate native, less-water intensive plants for all landscaping. At least that is a concrete requirement to improve the water demand. Enough? Maybe, maybe not, but more than ERCOT apparently did after 2011.

Your post must include a link to this post.

How does this work?
Write a response on your own website and include a link to this post. Then submit your response’s URL here. Your response may appear here after moderation. To update or remove it, edit or delete your original post and submit the same URL again. Learn more about Webmentions.